南京酒店vi設計的一項民意調查人和時代南京酒店vi設計公司的獨特創(chuàng)意。

南京酒店vi設計的一項民意調查人和時代南京酒店vi設計公司的獨特創(chuàng)意。

In a poll of 30,000 customers, Kraft offered new alternatives to iSnack 2.0.30000年的一項民意調查顯示顧客,卡夫的選擇提供了iSnack 2.0。These included Cheesybite, Vegemate, Smooth, Vegemild, and Snackmate. 其中包括Cheesybite,Vegemate、光滑、Vegemild,Snackmate。The audience resoundingly chose Cheesybite with over a third of the votes. 觀眾resoundingly選擇Cheesybite經過第三的選票。However, the difficulties have not ended there.然而,困難并沒有到此結束。

As many pizza fans may note, there is another product on the market called the Cheesy Bite, with the name trademarked to Pizza Hut since 2006. 盡可能多的披薩迷們會注意,有另一個產品在市場上稱為瀟灑的咬,名字叫,自2006年以來有必勝客。Experts are expecting a confrontation any day, as Kraft attempted to trademark the similar name last week.專家們正期待一個對抗的任何一天,卡夫試圖商標類似名稱上個星期。

Kraft has stated that they are confident in their ability to create space between their CheesyBite and that of the well-known pizza snack. 卡夫公司宣稱,他們對自己的能力有信心以留出空間,他們之間的CheesyBite著名的比薩的點心。The company certainly has quite a legal and公司當然有相當?shù)姆蒐ondon based logo design team位于倫敦標志設計團隊, but the names may be too similar for any argument. 可以,但名字太相似的任何爭論。In addition, having a snack with a name so similar to other snacks may actually be disastrous for the brand, more so than a ridiculed digital name that has nothing to do with the snack at hand.此外,有點心用的名字,所以類似的其他零食,實際上可能是災難性的南京酒店品牌,比起嘲笑數(shù)字的名字無關的零食的手。